Euthanasia argumentative essay example can be understood in many different ways.
Those who argue against when writing right to die essay paper claim that it is morally and ethically wrong.
Argumentative topics for nursing relate to giving drugs to patients to kill them, despite their critical conditions.
pro-euthanasia arguments essay writers interpret that the doctor can convince the patient to accept the assisted suicide.
That the patient can be making the decision under his or her conscience or consent.
Those in defense of voluntary euthanasia often explain that it is a form of “life-terminating experience”.
They state this in their introductory paragraph for an argumentative essay, they view it as not a way of taking a life of another.
The patient may request euthanasia due to unbearable health conditions that make them unable to persevere in the suffering.
Argumentative essay introduction paragraph outline is important in this case to help you formulate your ideas in a logical way.
Whichever the arguments that have been made, argumentative essay on euthanasia, it is important for one to understand the meaning when writing essays about euthanasia.
Euthanasia refers to the shortening of a person’s dying process by use of medication such as the sedatives.
Euthanasia is sometimes considered as recommendable, it when used under the consent of the relatives and the loved ones of the patient; it improves the quality of the dying process.
Such arguments in euthanasia debate essay validate the practice of euthanasia.
Some pro euthanasia essays have argued that it is acceptable since it concerns an action which dying is the result and the purpose (Green & Palpant, 2014).
Argumentative thesis statement outline: Although doctors should not have the right to practice euthanasia to patients, I will show that doctors have the right to euthanasia, and I will briefly explain three points to support my thesis.
Remember this is a euthanasia argumentative essay example.
Euthanasia violates nature’s rules that even doctors do not have the right to deprive a patient of his life.
Opponents in the euthanasia essay debate argue that euthanasia is killing the patient without his or her consent.
Such a definition of euthanasia is unclear.
In a broader sense, such a definition applies only to the voluntary euthanasia.
However, those who argue on voluntary euthanasia exclude what others refer to it as involuntary euthanasia.
Thus reducing the shortness of palliative terminal cure for patients with no prospect of a meaningful recovery.
From this argument, therefore, I will argue that euthanasia is always used in difficult situations.
On the first argument, life is supposed to be full of happiness instead of people suffering from diseases.
The prospect of ever suffering from dementia can be enough reason to choose euthanasia.
Patients continue to suffer a life of unbearable pain with no sign of improvement.
Instead of suffering, I suit to be more appropriate if the patient to choose euthanasia.
Moreover, euthanasia is appropriate for patients who are terminally ill and cannot recover.
For instance, patients who are suffering from dementia can be in a terminal condition or in incurable conditions.
The use of right to die essay paper is appropriate because there can be no sign of the patient improvement.
Another point is that patients’ rights should be respected and the power to make decision should be given to them.
Patients have the right to given alternatives to euthanasia and time to evaluate them before making informed consent.
On involuntary euthanasia, the family members can choose euthanasia.
This is especially when the patient spent years in a hospital in coma.
In such a situation, euthanasia can help to reduce the medical cost (Baker & Horder, 2013).
It is often difficult for the patient to choose euthanasia; however, they may not prove if it is the person’s desire.
There are many legal procedures that pertain to euthanasia and sometimes patients enter a legal agreement with the hospital administration to consider euthanasia in case they are in incurable and terminal conditions.
Patients’ health status and history must be strictly before consent to euthanasia.
The patient must sign a legal agreement to confirm that they have agreed to choose euthanasia (Smith, 2014).
There are those who argue that the doctor cannot provide a guarantee for adequate diagnosis.
However, choosing euthanasia is often the last resort of the medical treatment.
As a result, doctors have full medical record of the patient that can guarantee that the doctor has done thorough diagnosis to prescribe euthanasia to the patient.
In addition, hospitals have technology facilities that ensure accurate data is before choosing euthanasia (Paterson, 2012).
There are other arguments that have supported euthanasia.
Such include it can help to reduce medical resources spent on the patient, reduces the financial burden to the family, patients under the terminal conditions and that even some consider that their organs can be taken for donations (Wilkinson & Savulescu, 2010).
Euthanasia, directly without the patient’s consent, that is, involuntary euthanasia.
Moreover, euthanasia on patients who provide the consent to the doctors before they proceed to terminate their lives.
In both situations, euthanasia is applicable with or without the consent of the patient; as a result, this justifies the right to euthanize patients. See sample definition essays here
Order euthanasia argumentative essay example.
Baker, D.J., & Horder, J. (2013). The Sanctity of Life and the Criminal Law: The Legacy of
Glanville Williams. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press
Green, R.M., & Palpant, N.J. (2014). Suffering and Bioethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press
You must be logged in to post a comment